Umia (UMIA)

Analysis

UMIA is dangerous (39/100). The main concern: the team still has control over the token: can mint new tokens, trading can be paused. Those powers can change the rules after you buy. On the plus side, the pools hold $3.13M, which is deep enough for normal trades. This reading comes only from on-chain facts and lowers the risk; it never removes it.

• ⚠ The team still has control over the token: can mint new tokens, trading can be paused. Those powers can change the rules after you buy.
• ✓ The pools hold $3.13M, which is deep enough for normal trades.
• ✓ About $39.6K can be sold before the price drops 5%.
• ✓ Ownership is spread out: the 10 biggest wallets hold 0.0%.
• ✓ It has traded for 70 days.

Summary

Serious warning signs. Most buyers of tokens like this lose money.

• Can mint new tokens
• Trading can be paused
• Has an owner

• Code cannot change
• Deep liquidity ($3.13M)
• Well spread: top 10 wallets hold 0.0%

Not checked: The sell test has not run yet · Source code is not checked · Whether the liquidity is locked · When the token launched

Every check

• Code cannot change. Not an upgradeable proxy: the token code is fixed.
• Has an owner. 0x57fb…fb05 controls the owner-only functions below.
• Can mint new tokens. The contract has a mint function: the owner can print more supply.
• Trading can be paused. The owner can pause all transfers.
• Liquidity in v3/v4 positions. This pool uses Uniswap position NFTs; lock status cannot be read like a v2 pool.

How it can improve

• Can mint new tokens: Revoke the mint authority so nobody can print more tokens. On Solana: spl-token authorize <MINT> mint --disable. On EVM chains, renounce the role that can mint.
• Trading can be paused: Remove or renounce the switch that can pause trading.
• Has an owner: Renounce ownership, or move it to a multisig with a public timelock if the team still needs it.